Home > Uncategorized > The Crazy Core-Roster Conundrum

The Crazy Core-Roster Conundrum

Exactly one month ago, I wrote a piece titled “Wolves’ success should rely on Thunder’s rebuilding scheme” where I stated that the Wolves need to choose one player to build around instead of just acquiring a plethora of talent. David Kahn referenced that the team has a core roster of Jefferson, Love, Flynn, Brewer, Gomes and Ellington. That’s a BIG core roster. I believe that a team ought to be built more around one person as opposed to a group of players because that way you can implement a better game plan around one person and find talent to surround and support that one player. There’s only one ball to go around, right? Well the person I chose in that article was Al Jefferson and the evidence to support my claim I felt was justified at the time, but after a month of more evaluation, my opinion has swayed. So who deserves to be the Wolves’ “core” guy?

I have now turned my attention to Kevin Love. I’m not saying I disregarded him in the first place but I did feel, and still do a little bit, that Love may not be a true franchise player. He just doesn’t possess the scoring ability as other top franchise players do. I think he probably maxes out at about 20 points a game over the span of a regular season but what really caught my attention is his rebounding and overall efficiency ratings.

This chart compares and contrasts Jefferson and Love’s numbers this season through Sunday night’s game. It shows that Love’s efficiency is stable enough to carry a team on his back, despite his lack of scoring compared to other franchise players. The thing to keep in mind is that Love is the Wolves’ sixth man right now; he comes off the bench and plays less minutes than Jefferson. My point is that Love is way more efficient, if you look at PER (Player Efficiency Rating), for the time he is on the court. So, Love plays less minutes and, yet, is still more effective than Jefferson.

Jefferson does score more per game but again, that’s where Love’s lack of minutes comes in. If Love were to play the same amount of minutes as Jefferson does per game, the chart would then look like this:

As you can see, if Love were playing just four minutes more per game, equal to Jefferson, he would be grabbing about three more boards than Jefferson as well as scoring almost the same amount of points at 17.1 to Jefferson’s 17.5. Love’s PER also goes through the roof over 25 which would rank 6th in the league between Kevin Durant and Chris Paul, two clear cut franchise guys, thus proving that he is way more efficient on the floor.

We saw Darko Milicic last night post an astounding plus-35 in the plus/minus category. That basically just means that the Wolves were hot when he was on the court and scored 35 more points than they gave up with Darko on the court. Oh, and that was only in 19 minutes. Jefferson played 29 minutes last night and posted a minus-37. That shows you that the team was not as effective on either side of the court with Jefferson in the game, and he played the second most minutes on the team behind Kevin Love. Now in comparison, Love played 31 minutes and was plus-24 last night, showing he was effective on both sides of the court.

The bottom-line is that the Wolves, in the midst of rebuilding, need someone who can be both effective and efficient with their minutes on both ends of the court. By playing Love more than just 6th man minutes and showing he is one of most effective players in the league as well as one of the best teammates in the league, the Wolves can not only improve over the rest of the season but also possibly gain interest from free agents that will be available next summer who might be swayed into wanting to play alongside Love. Love has proven that he is “Mr. Efficiency,” even when coming off the bench. The Wolves will need to figure out how to build around him by implementing more scoring opportunities and maybe more of a true center next to him (Darko anyone?). More importantly, I now think that maximizing Jefferson’s value via a trade next summer just might be the right move.

With Darko being more of a true center, these next couple months will help spell out a lot for the Wolves and us fans. We will truly find out if Big Al and Love can play together in the long run and if having more of a true center coming off the bench to stabilize the front line can help improve the efficiency on both offense and defense. It really should play out in one of two scenarios: 1) We find out that Darko plays better with Love and we improve defensively, then Jefferson may be on his way out. (Assuming we can convince Darko to stay) or 2) Jefferson, and even Love, show improvement on defense and the Wolves are able to work this thing out with Big Al and Love. Which scenario will play out? We have only 25 games to accumulate our final evaluations until David Kahn makes his moves this off-season to continue to make this team into a playoff contender.

Share with your friends:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • RSS
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email
  • Digg
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • MySpace
  • Print
Categories: Uncategorized Tags:
  1. February 23rd, 2010 at 13:33 | #1

    New @HowlinTWolf: The Crazy Core-Roster Conundrum http://bit.ly/bTY4Df #TWolves #NBA #MN

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  2. February 23rd, 2010 at 13:33 | #2

    Howlin’ T-Wolf: The Crazy Core-Roster Conundrum: Exactly one month ago, I wrote a piece titled “Wolves’ success sh… http://bit.ly/du5lMf

    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  3. Justin
    February 23rd, 2010 at 14:34 | #3

    I agree and disagree.

    I agree in the sense that when the decision comes whether to move Jeff or Love the answer is clearly Jeff. Love makes a team run so much smoother and if he can develop a legit post game will score about 20 ppg. However he can’t be the best player on your team. He can be the second best player, but if he is the best player on your team you are going to be not that good. Why not build it around Ricky Rubio? Cause that’s kind of what I feel like they are doing. They feel they have their franchise player in Rubio and the way he is playing in Spain they might be right. Love fits that mold well of a guy who can play great off of rubio. Turner, Ellington and Brewer all kind of mesh with Rubio well too. I say you move Jefferson and any other asset besides Love and your top pick this year to try and get a Brook Lopez center type from the Nets and build a team around a elite pg and a great low post tandem.

    • Justin
      February 23rd, 2010 at 14:40 | #4

      I’m working off the assumption the Wolves draft Turner with the 2

  4. JSteinmeyer
    February 23rd, 2010 at 18:35 | #5

    Good point, Justin. Love may not be a franchise guy and that is why I argued for Jefferson in my first piece. But ever since his declination in numbers, I have a different perspective at what Love brings to the table. Building around Rubio could be very smart but we still don’t know if he’ll ever put on a Wolves jersey to play. You can’t build a team around someone that might not play there because he may not want to at all.

  5. Justin
    February 23rd, 2010 at 19:22 | #6

    I think the main issue is really whatever direction we decided to go Love or Jeff they are both no. 2 players on a championship team, I don’t see either being the MAN on a team that wins it all, they both have a skill set to compliment a number 1 guy. Jefferson would go well with a 1 that is more of half court offense type (Rose) or a great shooter (Bryant) While love needs more of a drive and dish type, and plays well off of pick and pops. I would say Rubio/Love/Turner would look brilliant together while Wall/Jefferson might make more sense. I guess maybe see how the draft shakes out? Cause if you get Wall, I think you might want to roll with Jeff and just lace the team with shooters. Where if you get Turner, the makings of a ball movement style team (Blazers like with Turner being the Roy) would make sense so focus on Love and Rubio

  6. Mark
    February 23rd, 2010 at 23:15 | #7

    To me, once you factor in the salary difference, Kevin Love is the slam-dunk choice for player to build around in the future.

    I actually see Love being similar to a young Kevin Garnett in a lot of ways. He’ll get you 20 points and he’ll fill up the stat sheet in ways that are underappreciated, but you never really rely on or think of him as a finisher at the end of games.

    Garnett is obviously superior on the defensive end, but Kevin Love’s rebounding rate is just an amazing asset for a player to possess. Additionally, Kevin Love’s PER of 22.7 in his age 21 season is noticably superior to Kevin Garnett’s PER 20.4 PER in his age 21 season. Garnett did not reach a PER above Love’s current level until he was 23 years old.

    If Love gets a couple of marquee wings around him in the draft (Turner, Johnson, etc.), this team could improve dramatically in the very near future and, hopefully, resemble a younger version of the Boston model that eventually brought KG his championship.

  1. No trackbacks yet.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Additional comments powered by BackType