Before we begin, I need you to do me a big favor. Just watch that video below and do your absolute best to watch it to the end. I promise this isn’t some trick that’s going to show you some close-up of Paul George’s mangled shin bone, but I’d be lying if I told you it wasn’t pretty brutal as well, just in a completely different sense.
Okay, now that that’s over, let’s begin to bash the brutally pathetic reporting/journalistic skills of that interview. I’m not going to bash Bram Weinstein for the interview questioning because he probably didn’t come up with the questions. But, on the other hand, since he was the “journalist” pestering Wiggins into answering those bizarrely unfair questions, he’s getting grouped in on this rant.
See it like this: there’s a
more-than-likely potential trade that’s about to go down. Somehow, some way Kevin Love is going to be wearing a Cavaliers jersey by the beginning of next season. That much we know, especially after Glen Taylor admitted as much in a recent interview. But the whole proprietor of a coming deal — Kevin Love’s camp — has been pretty mum on the whole thing. Rather, they’ve taken on the Minnesota nature and played the situation so painfully passive-aggressively that it’s forced the media to take on the narrative themselves.
That in itself can be a huge problem, especially in today’s world of lightning-fast news via Twitter without needing so much as a “BREAKING” or “SOURCES” taking up very few of your precious 140 character “report.” Because of the national firestorm that can catch ablaze in just seconds nowadays, the Love trade has risen to a whole new level, like that new storm movie. And Andrew Wiggins’ interview was the tipping point of it getting out of control.
This is how I see it: Wiggins is a 19-year old. He probably plays a lot of video games, eats candy and junk food and stays up probably way too late. He’s a teenager through and through despite the fact that he can leap into the sky 45-inches on average. But he’s still just a kid, and because of one media outlets attempt to prove their reports right — that Love-for-Wiggins is near inevitable — that latest interview is the byproduct of sticking an innocent player in the middle of a battlefield. In my honest opinion as, 1) a fan of basketball, the NBA and the Timberwolves, and; 2) a former student of the art of journalism with a degree in PROFESSIONAL Journalism and Sports Management, I believe ESPN hung out one of its subjects to dry, and if he wasn’t so inclined to being the top overall draft pick in a worldwide-recognized sport, his agent, his camp and he himself would never do such an interview again for ESPN.
In the middle of watching horrible interview, I couldn’t help but think, “Where’s Kevin Love?” After all, he’s the proprietor, remember? He’s the one wanting out of his current situation, and in order to grant him that, there will be some innocent bystanders affected such as Wiggins and perhaps Anthony Bennett. So why not go after him with these kinds of questions? Pressure him into answering, “Since you’re not sure what jersey you’re wearing next year, how do you feel?” Or “What do you have to say to Minneapolis or Cleveland about playing for them in their respective cities?”
Maybe ESPN was smart in grabbing the innocent, know-nothing player involved here. Maybe they thought they could get him to say something everyone doesn’t already suspect because he is just a rookie. After all, he doesn’t know any better, and he himself said he’s just a rookie, he has no say. But if you take that approach, you’re just furthering the notion that ESPN reprehended its duty as a journalistic outlet by trying to play “gotcha” journalism with someone who didn’t know any better. On top of that, they unveiled a genuine lack of being able to choose frontline sources to confirm reports of their own. Wiggins himself, as a rookie in the NBA, isn’t going to be told a damn thing about any trade he may or may not be involved in. For one, that’d be a massive misstep in following the rules by the Cavaliers, and two, why should Wiggins be involved in that process? He himself, once again, said he’s just a rookie, he has no say. So shame on ESPN for believe that he could give insight into a closed-lips process since the very beginning.
Wiggins himself, the Cavaliers and the Timberwolves all have a right to be upset with ESPN’s interview yesterday. It was a poor, pathetic attempt to wiggle their way further into the reports they themselves created, while leaving the rookie to fend for himself. If you didn’t think he felt “wanted” before, now they probably made things even worse. The interview could’ve been very simple. A couple “How’s your life changed so far?”, “Have you met any new people along the way?”. That would’ve been easy, made for a watchable interview and then still carried out their initial prerogative by dropping just one potential trade question in there, and not conduct the interview with a barrage of FULLY-LOADED questions that were going to get the kid in trouble.
If there ever were a time Wiggins would want to feel “wanted” it was definitely after something like that. And it probably doesn’t even matter which franchise warmed him up with blankets and hot cocoa. But I can assure you this, judging by the backlash on the Internet by Wolves fans everywhere, Minnesota is going to be a place that genuinuely wants to have Wiggins a part of this team’s future. As a team that’s struggled greatly to just get back to the postseason in over 10 years, adding high-quality young talent is a must, whenever they see fit. In other words, the Wolves couldn’t ever have enough star-potential guys under the age of 22. Wiggins would be the cream of the crop, if the trade were to go down, and fans here would go ballistic to see him as part of this franchise.
So if Wiggins’ true feelings are to simply play for a team that wants him, loves him for who he is, and will be patient enough to live through his mistakes in order to get better, Minnesota is the place for him.