Minnesota Timberwolves Draft Prospect: Ben McLemore

Ben_t640
Ben McLemore, University of Kansas

Position:Height:Weight:Birthday:Rankings:
Shooting Guard6-51852/11/1993
(20 Years Old)
ESPN: #3
Draft Express: #2
CBS Sports: #1

Positives: Ben McLemore and the Timberwolves are different in that McLemore can shoot, and the Timberwolves can’t. Currently, the Timberwolves are 30th in the league in three point shooting and 24th in free throw percentage. What’s this? Oh, McLemore shot 41.6% this season at Kansas. That’s cool, but can he make his– he made 87% of his free throws, too?! And, good grief, 55% from the field, Ben McLemore? Stop. This is just too good to be true. Well, with the projected seventh pick in the draft it sort of is too good to be true.

On the other side of the ball, McLemore possesses a 6’7.5 wingspan to go with his 6’4 frame, which is good, and enables to help him defend the two guard possession well in college, and should mostly translate to the NBA as well. It helps having good instincts, which by all accounts he does, and would also fill the need of a two-way guard that can play big minutes.

Negatives: A major knock on McLemore is that he is not a strong ballhandler and while that is something that can certainly be improved considering his age, it may make for a frustrating few early years for McLemore as he adapts to going up against bigger, faster and stronger players than he faced in college. Because of his poor ball skills, he struggles to create his own shot and shoot off the dribble. This is also a potential worry if his shot isn’t falling and what he is going to do to keep the offense from stagnating. We’ve seen young guards get taken out of games on nights when their shots aren’t falling, and McLemore is going to have to be able to do other things to get involved in the offense if his shot isn’t falling.

Bottom Line: McLemore already has a nice base of offensive skills at a relatively young age, and while he needs to improve on some things, also seems to have some good basketball instincts to aid him. After all, ask Anthony Randolph, you can’t teach things like awareness and instinct. Defensively, I don’t expect him to be elite because his physical tools are just good and not great for the NBA. Actually, I’d say that his ceiling sounds like a starter on a playoff team, but if he’s your best player life may not be so good.

Timberwolves Fit: Considering how awry this season has gone for the Timberwolves and how you could make the case that they probably shouldn’t even be here, getting McLemore would be some serious good fortune for the Timberwolves. He fits two needs: an uber athletic two that can shoot and play some defense. With a point guard like Ricky Rubio he would be able to be a knockdown shooter as he develops his ballhandling skills and the two could also potentially make a formidable tandem in the backcourt on defense. Even if he can’t create well for himself now, as long as he can be average at moving without the ball Rubio will set him up for good looks, which we can guess McLemore would hit since he was so efficient from within the arc in college.

It’s probably a dream to think that the Timberwolves move up high enough or fall low enough to get McLemore, but if either somehow happened, it would go a long way to further brighten the Timberwolves’ future.

Minnesota Timberwolves Draft Prospect: Nerlens Noel

Nerlens-Noel
Nerlens Noel, University of Kentucky

Position:Height:Weight:Birthday:Rankings:
Center6-112104/10/1994
(18 Years Old)
ESPN: #1
Draft Express: #1
CBS Sports: #2

First off, welcome to the first post of a new series at HTW. We will be covering the NBA Draft in depth and it begins with our Draft Prospect series. Every Monday and Wednesday, treat yourself to read about all the new NBA-bound prospects. The Wolves currently own their own lottery pick and the Grizzlies’ 1st rounder, which will likely be in the low 20′s. So for all your draft needs and desires, be on the look out for these posts. And, as always, feel free to comment on here or on Twitter. We love discussion! Enjoy!

Positives: Just a few months after Kentucky’s super freshman center Anthony Davis was drafted first overall in the NBA Draft to the New Orleans Hornets Pelicans, Coach Calipari was blessed with yet another bouncy, defensive-minded center. Only this time, he might even be better at what Davis was really good at: Blocking shots. One of the purest shot blockers in college, Noel makes his impact on the court without the ball in his hands. Long, tall and explosive, Noel is a coach’s dream as the mainstay of any defense because of his athletic abilities. And he’s not the kind of player that let’s his athletic gifts speak for themselves. He has quick hands and a feel for playing active and aware defense, which is why his steals are just as important as his blocks. At 6’11″, Noel has the size to rebound at the NBA level, although he’ll probably need to add some strength and size to his frame in order to do so on a consistent basis. But at the college level, he was one of the better rebounders, grabbing 9.5 rbg. Also, a huge benefit to any team with an eye on Noel as a draft prospect is his age. Noel turns 19 in just over a week, and to my knowledge has not lied about his age unlike some of his peers. That’s a big plus in a league that puts youngsters at such a premium.

Negatives: As the consensus number one in most mock drafts, it’s difficult to pinpoint serious strengths in Noel’s game. Other than his pure rawness and lack of experience playing at a high level, I can’t really nitpick. Certainly his offense is the most glaring weakness in his overall game. Noel doesn’t really have anything resembling an effective post move, which is certainly limiting his offensive potential. I quickly noted Noel’s lack of strength in the positives section, even though that’s more of a negative. But bulking up will ultimately help his ability to get scrappy offensive rebounds and put backs. The biggest negative surrounding Noel is the torn ACL injury he suffered from earlier this year that cut his promising freshman campaign short. Noel’s injury is significant enough and all too familiar to Wolves fans, having just seen Ricky Rubio just start to regain form after tearing his ACL a whole year ago. It is indeed a year-long recovery, which cuts into the positive of being young. And we also have to wait and see how Noel recovers mentally from such an injury, which can be the most difficult aspect of the whole process. The injury is a serious setback and is leaving front offices asking, “Will Noel ever return to his explosive form after recovery?

Bottom Line: I don’t see Noel sporting the KG-like potential of Anthony Davis. Instead, I see him as more of an athletic and explosive, defensive-minded center that will protect the rim at will and grab a whole mess of rebounds. He’s not afraid to get down and dirty, which mirrors his skill level of being raw. All in all, Noel strikes me as a more athletic Joakim Noah with the chance to make a bigger impact earlier on in his career. Noel, before his injury, has shown that he only gets better with more experience, which certainly translates to the NBA game.

Timberwolves fit: We all know the real story of the Wolves’ offseason begins and ends with the Nikola Pekovic saga. The goal has to be to resign him but within reason in terms of a dollar amount (My best guess is they’re hoping no more than $10-$12 million a season). But with the Trail Blazers still lurking for a center in the dark and the ill-feelings they already warrant towards David Kahn and the entire Timberwolves franchise, you never know how things will turn out. For that very reason, a backup plan for a starting center has to be in place — that is unless they think Kevin Love can slide over and allow Derrick Williams to start at the power forward slot. But that’s an entirely different story for an entirely different day. That’s why Noel must be atop the Wolves draft board; he gives the Wolves a defensive-minded center that will assume the load of protecting the rim off of Love’s in-game to-do list, which is actually a better center option in the lineup, in my opinion. The odds of the Wolves stealing a top-three pick to nab the likes of Noel are slim-to-none. But a draft board doesn’t take chance or luck into account.

No business losing; Wolves lose 99-86

579702_10151412210834261_1772845716_n
Rubio continually got to the free throw line tonight, more than anyone else

Two Positives:

Jonah: Jim Peterson and Dave Benz, who have truly been great this season, mentioned the better scoring jobs as of late from Ricky Rubio. And when they said it, he had just six points. Well, Rubio finished with 23, a game-high actually. The root of his improved scoring has been his ability to get to the free throw line and convert. He was constantly getting tied up with Mike Conley and reaped the benefits of 12 attempts from the charity stripe (He nailed 10 of them).

Derek: Greg Stiemsma actually played pretty well last night. He played smart for forty minutes without getting into foul trouble or committing too many turnovers. Against this Grizzlies frontline, that’s no easy task, and he managed to convert the scoring opportunities he was given pretty well, too. He didn’t make us forget about Nikola Pekovic, but he did as good of a job in relief as we could have hoped for. That’s a compliment, right?

Two Negatives:

Jonah: Seriously, how did they let this one go? The Wolves led the game through the first three quarters but allowed the Grizzlies to keep in it the whole time. And for that, they got shunned in the fourth as the Grizzlies put up 34 that quarter. Obviously, they’re not used to winning but they ended up getting blown out of a game they led most of the way. It might’ve been one thing if it ended in a 3-point game but it didn’t. Things just turned embarrassing. It’s as simple as that.

Derek: You will not beat the Memphis Grizzlies by turning the ball over nearly twice as much as they did (16-9). If the Grizzlies are forcing turnovers then you better be, too.

Two Observations:

Jonah: Sooo, Chris Johnson got up to go in midway through the first quarter. It would’ve been his first time getting early game minutes in a very long time. But soon after, he retreated right to the bench, never to enter the game until late. How disappointing!

Derek: I don’t know where to put this, so I’ll just throw it here. Aside from the Grizzlies’ frontcourt I absolutely hate seeing the Grizzlies on the schedule because of their tenacity on defense. They do little things like get their hands active in passing lanes and body up players before they can get set in their spot. Really, while you may have possession of the ball, you’re playing Grizzlies basketball. If you’re a basketball fan, you love it, but if you’re a Timberwolves fan, you hate it.

We saw it in the fourth quarter as the Grizzlies put the clamps down on the Timberwolves, and essentially smothered their hopes and dreams. With no Pekovic in the paint, the Timberwolves had no big body that could hold his own against Gasol or Randolph, and the pair managed to push the bigs out of their desired position. Also, without Pek, the Timberwolves were unable to have an effective screen setter, and this enabled the Grizzlies to disrupt the Timberwolves offense by d-ing up their point guards well above the break. Doing so forced the Wolves into having Greg Stiemsma and Dante Cunningham (who had an off-night) into consecutive midrange jumpers.

Next up: The Wolves take on the KG-less Celtics on Monday night at the Target Center, 7 pm.

A sweet nothing; Wolves win 101-93

201303291955717065029-p2
Ak drives on Kevin Durant

Three Positives:

Jonah: Overall, this is a really fun win for the Wolves. It’s not often we get to watch them beat anyone let alone the top team in the West. They couldn’t contain Kevin Durant but certainly kept Russell Westbrook in check. And on the offensive end, they were efficient and played the best ball they could, running through Nikola Pekovic and his dominating post presence. But unfortunately, in a lost season, this entertaining bout becomes something of a sweet nothing. There’s nothing wrong with that; I’m simply stating the obvious.

Tom: I’ll give a nod to the Wolves in general for showing their ability to close a game out. Finishing against better teams in the fourth quarter is tough for any team, but the Wolves have struggled especially this year. But when Oklahoma City made a final push with about four minutes left, Minnesota buckled down and got stops against the explosive Thunder. More importantly, they got the necessary baskets to pull out the win.

As Jonah said above, the game itself didn’t matter in the long run, but it was definitely fun to beat the team the Wolves would like to become.

Derek: The Timberwolves may not be the league’s most potent offense, but it seems like they may have figured one thing out against the Thunder: Make enough shots to win, try to keep one of Durant and Westbrook in check, and try to win the turnover battle. This is the second time this season they have out-shot the Thunder, albeit slightly, and kept Westbrook from going off and basically dared the Thunder to beat them with more than just Durant. Dangerous? Sure, but the Thunder are a dangerous team anyway that you don’t stand a chance against if you have both getting whatever they want.

We’ve seen before how Durant and Westbrook have combined for 60, 70 and even 80 points of their offense, and that makes it difficult to win. Plus they played smart, getting easy shots in the paint, limiting and forcing turnovers, and doing little things like rebounding and moving the ball. You can beat a lot of teams that way.

Three Negatives:

Jonah: As stated in my positive, the Wolves couldn’t stop Kevin Durant. No problem. No one really can. But Durant seems to love playing in the Target Center. As a pro, Durant has averaged over 27 ppg, and has netted more than 30 in nine straight while on visit to the Twin Cities. So, come on, guys. Someone’s gotta guard the man!

Tom: *debates the merits of discussing the 5-15 3-point shooting* *debates the merits of discussing the 44% shooting from the field* *debates discussing the mere seven fast break points*

Nahhhhhh. Good win, guys.

Derek: I really don’t want to make too much of Derrick Williams 2-8 shooting performance in 26 minutes, but he still got involved in other ways and finished with two fouls and zero turnovers. So what’s really my gripe here? Would I even bother mentioning this if he hit even one or two more shots? It looked like an off-night for Williams, but this is my negatives section and I had to pick something! Anyway, it’s hard to be too negative about beating the Thunder.

Three Observations:

Jonah: At Pek’s size, I’ve always expected him to be a Kevin Love-like rebounder, but he just hasn’t for whatever reason. But tonight he grabbed 15 as well as 16 on Wednesday night against the Lakers. Without Love in the lineup, rebounding truly becomes a team stat and Pek’s contributions on the glass have been incredibly helpful.

Tom: I wasn’t at the game tonight, but from what those in attendance said, Rubio was in a foul mood during the game, kicking empty chairs and slamming the ball on the ground. Presumably, this can be tied back to the no-call against the Lakers that cost Minnesota the game. But oddly enough, I find it refreshing to hear he was angry. He deserved to be.

Derek: Chase Budinger really appears to just what the Timberwolves have needed, which we kind of knew, but his line of 13 points on 4-8 shooting from the field and 2-3 from distance really confirmed that. Are the Timberwolves still in the lower-third in the NBA as far as shooting? Probably, but they might not be last at least. At any rate, we got a good look at how this team can do with a shooter on the floor.

Next up: Wolves are back at it tomorrow night hosting the Grizzlies at 7 pm.

Kobe Bryant plays clutch “defense” on Ricky Rubio as Lakers beat Timberwolves

We will have a full recap up tomorrow at some point, but for tonight, I feel like this play warrants discussion. As Lakers and Timberwolves game wound down tonight, Kobe Bryant clutchly missed a free throw with three seconds left, giving the Wolves a chance to tie. Rubio grabbed the rebound and flew up the court, ready to toss up one final attempt at the buzzer. Then the above happened. Here’s a freeze frame.

Screen shot 2013-03-27 at 11.37.08 PM
The forearm is part of the ball?

Minnesota’s Fox Sports North announcers were not shy in voicing their displeasure, and neither were Ricks Rubio and Adelman. It’s not hard to see why; there was a lot of contact, and the contact clearly affected Rubio’s shot. The likelihood of Rubio hitting either the 3-pointer or the three free throws should be completely immaterial. If it was a foul, it should have been called as such. You can now bet on NBA Playoffs, odds are already available at Top Bet.

Now to be fair, officials are not given the option to go back and look if plays were fouls or not. This may have been difficult to see in real time (I’m being very generous here). Further, games are very rarely decided by the officiating, and this game is no different. Certainly, a bad no-call in the final seconds affected the outcome, but there’s a difference between a bad no-call affecting and deciding the game. The Lakers shot considerably better than the Wolves both from the 3-point line and from the field in general. If Minnesota shot or defended better, they could have won without the benefit of a questionable call.

But that doesn’t change the fact that there is something very wrong with a system in which a referee does not feel comfortable making what was clearly the right call as time expires. Certainly, Kobe is a superstar, and he is one of the most popular players in the league, but his status doesn’t shouldn’t elevate him above the common rules of the game (rules like “You can’t swat a guy across his arms to prevent him from getting a real look at a potentially game-tying shot”).

Rubio probably wouldn’t have made that shot (which, incidentally, makes Kobe’s alleged foul a really stupid basketball play). He probably wouldn’t have made his three free throws to send the game into overtime. But he deserved the chance, and for a franchise that hasn’t seen a victory against the Lakers in 22 tries, this leaves a particularly bitter taste behind.

Oh, and Kobe had this to say, per ESPN.

“That’s not a foul. They ain’t calling that s—,” Bryant said. “I don’t think I got him. That’s a tough call to make. I just put my hand in. It’s not like I went out and smacked him across the arm or anything like that. It is what it is.”

Would Bryant have been “surprised” if a foul was called?

“No. We would have gone into overtime and won the game. It’s as simple as that.”

Allow me to make one addendum: They ain’t calling that s— on YOU, Kobe. You and maybe two other players won’t get called for that. I hope you realize how lucky that makes you.

Follow Tom on Twitter: @Tom_NBA.

Three-ball barrage; Wolves win 105-82

Derrick Williams goes up on the break; see my negative
Derrick Williams goes up on the break; see my negative

Three Positives: 

Jonah: I’m sure even the Timberwolves didn’t see this coming but their 14 connections from deep are a season-high and come at just the oddest time, in a nothing game against the Pistons. Whatever, though. What tonight did solidify for me was that, given some dead-eye shooters and a brute presence in the paint, the Wolves are a really good team. It’s this kind of game that I picture a fully healthy Wolves squad to play like at the offensive end. That’s really exciting to envision.

Tom: Things we learned about Alexey Shved’s passing tonight: If the Wolves knock down shots, he can be a very good drive-and-kick player. Shved dished out seven assists, and six of the seven were driving passes that turned into jumpers. Sure, it helps for the Wolves to be hot like blue flames, but Shved’s passing was definitely a positive this evening.

Derek: I’m not a huge plus/minus guy, but this is interesting to note in such a blowout win. Timberwolves starters plus/minus’: 18-23-28-16-26. Clearly the Timberwolves need to do one of three things in the future: 1) Shoot 50% from 3; 2) Play lockdown defense; 3) Play the Pistons every night.

Three Negatives:

Jonah: Derrick Williams of old sorta showed up again tonight. He finished with six in just 17 minutes, mostly because of some boneheaded D-Will plays. Like one when he dribbled down court himself, took it to the rack and got called for the charge. Just so blatantly too. The ensuing visual? A Rick Adelman facepalm. After that I couldn’t see the screen because I emulated the same move.

Tom: Aside from Williams’ somewhat mediocre performance, it’s hard to pick nits with tonight’s game. Chase Budinger continues to look a little bit uncomfortable, but his free pass to look uncomfortable doesn’t run out for a while. What’s more, we saw a few drives and cuts from Budinger, and even though few of them translated into points, it’s good to see him testing things out and re-acquainting himself with the court.

Derek: Timberwolves starters-not-named-Nikola-Pekovic 3 point shooting: 7-10. Nikola Pekovic from 3 tonight: 0-0. Oh, someone didn’t feel like doing their part…

…I’m kidding of course. You could point out a few small things here and there, as far as negatives that that haven’t been mentioned, but you would really picking nits.

Three Observations:

Jonah: He’s 6-foot-9 and ultra lanky, so when Andrei Kirilenko goes up for a slam, it looks sorta awkward. But in full stride and with some oomph, AK’s literally one of my favorite dunkers. Just so simple yet but fun to watch.

Tom: In a little under half of Ricky Rubio’s games, we express surprise at how well he shot and wish he could shoot that well consistently. Tonight, he shot 6-9 with two made 3-pointers. If Zach Lowe is correct (he usually is) and shooting is perhaps the easiest thing for NBA coaches to teach their players, Rubio’s potential is so unbelievably high.

Also of note: That pass where he throws his arm way out and whips a pocket pass into the middle of the defense is one of my favorite plays in basketball.

Derek: This isn’t really a positive or a negative, so it’s going here. Know how I know you shot 53% from three on 26 shots? Well, you only took eight free throws in the entire game. Furthermore, here is a list of players who didn’t go to the line even once: Luke Ridnour, JJ Barea, Alexey Shved, and Derrick Williams. There were more who didn’t get to the line, but these are the ones that stand out considering their styles of play, but when you’re shooting threes like that I’m not going to complain about not drawing a bunch of fouls and just observe it.

Next up: Wolves come back home to take on the hated Los Angeles Lakers, 7 pm.

Never enough; Wolves lose 104-97

Robinson sparks Bulls to 104-97 win over T-Wolves
Rubio can’t do it all by himself

Two Positives:

Jonah: The game after his odd benching in Phoenix, Derrick Williams picked up where he left off by tying his career-high in points (28). And he was fairly efficient too; 11-18 from the field including three deep bombs. Williams’ improved play is going to leave the Wolves with a big decision to make on his future moving forward. My take? Ya keep him and milk his production as long as it takes.

Tom: After Williams’ excellent performance (and I concur with Jonah’s assessment of the situation), the next logical player to highlight is Ricky Rubio, who had a very solid game with 15 points on 4-8 shooting. Two very notable things about Ricky’s performance that are inextricably tied together: Rubio was 7-10 from the free throw line, and he dished out eight assists. Both statistics were a direct result of his offensive aggression, which has been much, much better as of late. Many of his assists were pick-and-roll dishes, including one gorgeous between-two-defenders bounce pass to Nikola Pekovic for the slam. Pekovic’s efficiency can often be predicted simply by looking at Rubio’s stat-line, and sure enough: Pek finished 6-9 from the field for 15 points.

Two Negatives:

Jonah: This game is hard to analyze. Just looking at the numbers, the Wolves shot 50% from the field and make just two less field goals than the Bulls. They hit 50% from three-point land as well while dropping in one more free throw and one less turnover than the Bulls as well. The difference? Rebounds. The Wolves got their ass’ handed to them in the paint and completely wiped on the glass. For being known as workhorse rebounding team, getting beat by 20 is unacceptable, even if you’re missing your top rebounder. Rebounding is a team stat that requires everyone’s attention and aggressiveness.

Tom: I quote: ”‘They could complain about how many guys they’ve got hurt and they don’t do that,’ Rubio said. ‘They just play aggressive. We have to learn from that. If they can do it, we can do it, too.’”

I admire Rubio’s sentiment, and I appreciate the amount of heart and hustle we see from him on a nightly basis, even in ugly losing efforts. I just don’t think that Chicago’s injury problems, though certainly severe, can be compared to Minnesota’s. You can play aggressive, but when Lou Amundson got significant minutes for much of the year, aggressive just isn’t going to cut it.

Two Observations:

Jonah: Moving forward, I’m starting more and more to question Alexey Shved’s role on this team. He can’t seem to coincide with Rubio all that well — although he hasn’t gotten much of a chance quite yet. But he seems to only be effective when the ball’s in his own hands. He’ll never be a spot up shooter, nor do I believe that’s what Adelman wants from him. It’s cliche but this rookie wall is bearing down hard. It’s time to shoulder through it and build confidence moving into the offseason.

Tom: Three jumpers for Budinger tonight, who seems to be picking his spots and getting comfortable as he returns. He looks understandably hesitant still, but the good news is that he is a good enough shooter to contribute while he works his way back to full health.

The downside: Seeing Budinger knocking down jumpers and driving to the basket is a gigantic tease knowing how much he would have helped this season back when it wasn’t a lost cause.

Next up: The Wolves meet in Detroit to take on the Pistons on Tuesday night, 7 pm.

Desert blowout; Wolves win 117-86

Wolves rout Suns 117-86 to snap 9-game road skid
Pekovic was able to dominate against a weak Suns frontcourt

One Positives:

Jonah: The Suns are a pretty awful team. Awful enough to probably predict that the front office was more invested in the NCAA Tournament today than this game. But it still has to feel nice to win handily, against anyone, for the Wolves. After last night’s loss in Sacramento, I surveyed some photos from the game and came across a depressing picture of Rick Adelman and Ricky Rubio embracing each other with arms around one another as they walked back to the locker room. That’s the mentality surrounding the locker room on a nightly basis, and the only way to turn it around would be to gain some wins. That’s why this one is important at least for the Wolves.

One Negatives:

Jonah: This isn’t so much a negative on the team rather Adelman’s questionable decision to sit Derrick Williams for the majority of the night. He finished with just four points, all from the line, in just 14 minutes. There’s speculation as to whether he was injured or not feeling well but no one has a firm grasp on what happened. Anyways, given the advancements in his game we’ve witnessed the past few months, it’s hard to justify sitting him in a game he could get some easy reps. I’m not all that happy about that.

One Observations:

Jonah: In yesterday’s recap I wrote about Greg Stiemsma’s ever-improving offensive efficiency. Tonight, Stiemer went 6-10 from the field for 14 points in 34 minutes of work. Boom.

Next up: Wolves come home to play the Bulls on Sunday evening, 6 pm.

The return of Bud; Wolves lose 101-98

Sacramento Kings guard Isaiah Thomas, left, reaches in for the ball against Minnesota Timberwolves guard Ricky Rubio, of Spain, during the first quarter of an NBA basketball game in Sacramento, Calif., Thursday, March 21, 2013
Kings’ backcourt was just way too good in this one

Two Positives:

Jonah: I’m a big Bud fan, if you didn’t already know, so seeing Chase sprint the court, albeit for just 18 minutes, was certainly reassuring. I wasn’t — and won’t be moving forward — expecting too much while he returns from a torn meniscus but he also doesn’t need to do much to set up shop in a corner and rain down threes, something the Wolves need so desperately.

Derek: I really like efficient Nikola Pekovic– 18 and 12 on 6-12 shooting, and 6-8 from the line on top of that. Nice game for Pek.

Two Negatives:

Jonah: Budinger returns and hits a three. How does the rest of the team respond to his shooting? They go 0-18 from three-point land for the rest of the game. Just so awful. You’d think that just seeing a deep ball slide through the net would give someone else some confidence but it doesn’t. That’s just how historically bad this team is at shooting.

Derek: On the possession prior to the final possession, the Timberwolves subbed in Andrei Kirilenko and Dante Cunningham for defensive reasons, which is a fine strategy unless you’re not going to call a timeout to sub in more offensive players. Instead, Rubio kicked it to Ridnour, who passed it to Cunningham who was forced to take a three that he missed at the last second. Even though they would’ve had to inbound from the backcourt if they had taken a timeout, making for a tougher shot, I would’ve preferred to see Ridnour take that shot if they didn’t take the timeout.

Two Observations:

Jonah: Ever since Nikola Pekovic went down to minor injuries, Greg Stiemsma’s role has increased substantially  seeing that he’s the only other center on the roster with the ability and strength to play every opponent. Sorry, Chris Johnson. And I have to admit, he’s certainly been getting better and better each time he goes out there. He still makes some knuckle-headed decisions but I’m very impressed with Stiemer’s advanced offensive ability. In the last five games, he’s averaging just over eight points a game and shooting 53% from the field.

Derek: You all know I love the Timberwolves, but I’ve also been a huge fan of the Kings’ Isaiah Thomas since his Washington days, and  who was also the 60th pick in the draft a couple of years ago. Despite concerns over his size he’s risen to being a starter in the NBA and put up 24-3-6 last night. I know, I know…#trader!

Next up: Wolves stay out west to take on Phoenix tonight at 9 pm.

The Relocation Two-Step: Timberwolves at Kings Preview

David Stern and Glen Taylor saved professional basketball in Minnesota. Now, the Kings are hoping for a similar miracle in Sacramento.

Where: Sleep Train Arena; Sacramento, CA

When: 9pm CST (Wait– I can watch? Hell yeah!)

See It: LOL NO

Hear It: WCCO AM 830

In 1994, our very own Minnesota Timberwolves were in trouble. The city of Minneapolis had just built the Target Center four years prior, but the current ownership of Marv Wolfenson and Harvey Ratner wanted out from under the $73 million mortgage, because, as it turns out, new arenas are expensive. This was suddenly a tense time for the Minnesota sporting amalgamate as they had just lost the NHL North Stars to Dallas a few years before, and losing the Timberwolves after just five years would’ve made them look like the guy who can’t hold down a girlfriend from one reason or the other.

At any rate, Harv and Marv wanted out from the remaining balance on the mortgage, and with cities like New Orleans and Nashville pining for a team, they were likely to be relocated if the team were sold to a new ownership group.

In not an unsurprising manner, when they state stepped in to bailout Harv and Marv, the fans stood against the measures with 60% of the public that were polled did not want the state to use public funds to pay off the debt on the Target Center. Which was fantastic because the New Orleans ownership group Top Rank had submitted a letter of intent to purchase the team and move them down to the bayou.

However, the support slowly began to get behind the state’s intervention, and Nashville’s Gaylord Entertainment group made essentially a $100 million dollar offer with 20% of that going to pay down the debt on the arena. With the condition that the group keep the team in the state for thirty years, this became the favorite offer. This was around the same time the city of Nashville was also trying to woo the New Jersey Devils to the city in an attempt to desperately secure a professional sports team in the state, too (It wouldn’t be long before the Oilers would relocate to Tennessee either.) Shortly after the Minnesota legislature approved a $48 million dollar bill that purchased the arena, so long as they could find a local ownership group to match Top Rank’s $152 million dollar offer.

But they couldn’t, and later that May the sale was approved and professional basketball’s days in Minnesota were seemingly numbered.

However, just three weeks later after questions about their financing and where they would play home games, the league blocked the sale. Turns out the league was wary of a group attempting to purchase of team where a third of their offer comes from “undisclosed sources”. Say what you will about David Stern, but he did act as mediator and in acting the best interest of the league he did stop the team from heading to New Orleans. Shortly after this the league filed an injunction against the transfer of the team from Minnesota. Naturally, this pissed off Top Rank and they filed a counter-suit in Louisiana court, but a Federal court wound up ruling in favor of Minnesota, saving the team for at least the ’94-’95 season.

Local bidders came and went, but Glen Taylor stepped in and in October of ’94 the league approved Taylor’s purchase of the team. In related news, Top Rank would go bankrupt in ’95, which isn’t shocking considering they were attempting to use not only “undisclosed sources” to purchase the team, but up to a reported $75 million in loans from banks that just did not want to lend them the money just yet. So, good call be the league to block that purchase and save themselves from another potential hassle.

Why do I bring this up? Well, tonight the Kings, whom are fighting the same tortuous relocation battle the Timberwolves once did, play host to the Timberwolves.

By now, we all know the story of Joe and Gavin Maloof losing money through other bad investments (It take serious skill to go bankrupt running a hotel in Las Vegas) and trying to strong arm the city of Sacramento into a new arena while running their team just above the salary floor. Like Harv and Marv, they realized that their little basketball hobby was quite the expensive one and are looking for a way out when the price tag got too real. Of course, this means that resolution to the situation comes at the expense of Kings fans’ wallets or hearts.

Just how broke are the Maloofs? When the Seattle based group fronted by Chris Hansen reportedly purchased the team for $500 million dollars, Joe and Gavin would have still been several million in debt if they had put all of that to paying off their debtors. All of this raises the question if the Maloofs should even be rewarded with a new arena since history shows that even with a new arena, like the one Harv and Marv had, you still have to have the capital to keep the lights on and be able to pay the players. Unfortunately, the Maloofs don’t appear to have the money to fund an arena on their own meaning that if Kings fans want to pay for it they’re going to have to foot the bill.

In the early 00′s the Kings had one of the most exciting teams in basketball and the most rabid fans in the league. If you’re on Twitter, you’ve seen the grassroots Here We Stay movement, and if you frequent SB Nation blogs you’ve undoubtedly come across Tom Ziller’s excellent work to drive fan interest up to league’s New York meetings to discuss relocation. Kings fans are still there, passionate, and care about their team, make no mistake.

Tonight, this is the game around the game. If you’ve seen Sonicsgate or followed the Kings’ relocation saga, you know these things don’t end well. If you have done this and are a Timberwolves fan you should know how lucky we are to still have a team when the Grizzlies have left Vancouver and the Hornets have left Charlotte over arena issues. Just as the Timberwolves have been a major part of many of our lives through the good and bad, the same goes for Kings fans. I’m not against basketball going back to Seattle, but would hate to see it as a result of the poor decisions of their owners.

Projected Starting Fives: 

Ricky Rubio — PG — Isaiah Thomas

Luke Ridnour — SG — Tyreke Evans

Derrick Williams — SF — John Salmons

Andrei Kirilenko — PF — Jason Thompson

Nikola Pekovic — C — DeMarcus Cousins